Riparian Areas
RESILIENT HABITATSOverview
Strategies and Actions
Use arrow keys to navigate rows. Press Enter to follow a link. Press Space to expand or collapse.
| Strategy Action |
|---|
| Strategy Action |
|---|
What We're Tracking
The Partnership uses a system of indicators and targets to monitor our progress implementing regional priorities and movement towards Puget Sound recovery goals. Commitments describe activities that partners and the Partnership pledge to pursue over the next four years to implement the Action Agenda and/or the Salmon Recovery Plan. Progress Indicators track human activities that impact ecosystem health. Vital Sign Indicators track the status and trends of ecosystem conditions, including human health and quality of life.
2026-2030 Commitments
Commitments describe activities that partners and the Partnership pledge to pursue over the next four years to implement the Action Agenda and/or the Salmon Recovery Plan.
| Organization | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Washington State Conservation Commission |
Program Measure: Acres of new riparian area planted
Target: Restore 664 cumulative acres (2025-27 and 2027-29 biennia)
Program: Riparian Grant Program (RGP)
|
|
| Washington State Conservation Commission |
Program Measure: Acres of riparian area maintained (treatments such as herbaceous weed control/watering/replanting applied)
Target: Maintain 3,788 cumulative acres (2025-27 and 2027-29 biennia)
Program: Riparian Grant Program (RGP)
|
|
| Washington State Department of Ecology |
Program Measure: Acres of new riparian buffer planted in Puget Sound
Target: Plant 400 cumulative acres over four years
|
|
| Association of Washington Cities |
Commitment: Association of Washington Cities (AWC) and Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC) will support their represented cities and counties, respectively, in sharing best management practices for projects and programs that support riparian protection and restoration and engaging in discussions on how best to support the protection and restoration of riparian areas through 2027.
|
|
| Oregon State University |
Commitment: Oregon State University (OSU) will conduct research to understand elements of landowner willingness to allow access to their properties, to manage or restore their properties to improve salmon habitat, or to support policies and programs intended to improve salmon habitat on private land through 2027.
|
|
| Puget Sound Conservation Districts Caucus |
Commitment: Puget Sound Conservation Districts (PSCDs) will continue working with residents, landowners/managers and other partners on conducting education and outreach to new streamside and river properties, planning and implementing riparian restoration projects, and contributing to watershed-scale restoration efforts through 2030 and beyond.
|
|
| Puget Sound Partnership |
Commitment: Puget Sound Partnership (PSP) will coordinate with the State Conservation Commission (SCC) to build partnerships that advance riparian protection and restoration efforts through 2027.
|
|
| Puget Sound Partnership |
Commitment: Puget Sound Partnership (PSP) will support lead entities to develop riparian restoration and protection strategies through 2027.
|
|
| Puget Sound Partnership |
Commitment: Puget Sound Partnership (PSP) will research and analyze funding programs available for riparian restoration efforts by 2027.
|
|
| Puget Sound Partnership |
Commitment: Conservation Districts (CDs) will identify willing landowners and implement riparian projects using Washington State Conservation Commission's (SCC) $25 million in riparian funding through 2027.
|
|
| Puget Sound Partnership |
Commitment: Conservation Districts (CDs) will work with Bonneville Environmental Foundation (BEF) and Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY) through the Puget Sound Riparian Lead group to develop and implement projects through 2027.
|
|
| Puget Sound Partnership |
Commitment: Lead Entities will work with watershed partners to identify and advance riparian focused priorities through restoration and protection efforts to support established targets through 2030.
|
|
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
Commitment: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will increase permanent protection of riparian and associated wetland areas through a variety of regulatory and incentive mechanisms by 2026.
|
|
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
Commitment: Puget Sound Federal Leadership Task Force (PSFLTF) will contribute to the development of a coordinated state and federal shared riparian habitat restoration strategy that will support salmon recovery and resilience to climate change by 2026.
|
|
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
Commitment: Puget Sound Federal Leadership Task Force (PSFLTF) will identify specific policy, science or program needs that, if addressed, would catalyze additional riparian protection or restoration efforts across urban, agriculture and forested rural and wildland zones by 2026.
|
|
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
Commitment: Puget Sound Federal Leadership Task Force (PSFLTF) will identify specific local watersheds where coordinated investment in riparian protection/restoration would most benefit specific resource recovery objectives (Chinook, shellfish, etc.) by 2026.
|
|
| Washington Conservation Action |
Commitment: Washington Conservation Action (WCA) will engage in the Riparian Roundtable through December 2026 and continue to engage on riparian issues through 2030.
|
|
| Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife |
Commitment: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) will strive to provide web access to Riparian Data Engine through June 2026 and to Priority Habitats and Species information, existing High Resolution Change Detection data, and updated fish passage data on an ongoing basis.
|
|
| Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife |
Commitment: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) will strive to provide technical assistance to local governments with regard to the WDFW Riparian Guidance as feasible with existing resources through 2027.
|
|
| Washington State Association of Counties |
Commitment: Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC) will provide a venue through the Counties Coastal Caucus and/or affiliate organizations such as the County Planning Directors Association and County Engineers Association for the Puget Sound Partnership (PSP) to present new information or highlight learning opportunities for appropriate staff through 2027.
|
|
| Washington State Association of Counties |
Commitment: Association of Washington Cities (AWC) and Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC) will support their represented cities and counties, respectively, in sharing best management practices for projects and programs that support riparian protection and restoration and engaging in discussions on how best to support the protection and restoration of riparian areas through 2027.
|
|
| Washington State Conservation Commission |
Commitment: Washington State Conservation Commission (SCC) will support the recommendations of the Riparian Roundtable as they relate to our role as a non-regulatory agency that supports Conservation Districts in implementing voluntary, incentive-based restoration practices through 2027.
|
|
| Washington State Conservation Commission |
Commitment: Washington State Conservation Commission (SCC) will distribute funding for riparian restoration and acquisition through the Riparian Grant Program through 2027, including the development of tiered incentives that include higher landowner payments for larger buffers.
|
|
| Washington State Conservation Commission |
Commitment: Washington State Conservation Commission (SCC) will continue to develop the Integrated Science Hub for Agriculture and Ecosystems, which will include the development of incentives and monitoring of outcomes for riparian ecosystem restoration and protection through 2027.
|
|
| Washington State Conservation Commission |
Commitment: Washington State Conservation Commission (SCC) will build out the Science Hub, which facilitates the implementation of science-based solutions to protect and enhance natural resources and agricultural viability, advancing climate resiliency outcomes and cultivating collaborative partnerships for multi-benefit solutions within the voluntary conservation framework. The Science Hub will support the tracking and reporting of data from programs that support this action, including Conservation Technical Assistance, the Riparian Grant Program, Voluntary Stewardship Program, Shellfish Program, Sustainable Farms and Fields Program, Natural Resource Investments Program, Forest Health and Community Wildfire Resilience, and Regional Conservation Partnership Program through 2027.
|
|
| Washington State Department of Commerce |
Commitment: Washington State Department of Commerce (COM) will engage in the Riparian Roundtable through December 2026.
|
|
| Washington State Department of Ecology |
Commitment: Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY) will expand support for funding and incentives to promote healthy riparian buffers on private lands to reduce water quality impacts through 2027.
|
|
| Washington State Department of Ecology |
Commitment: Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY) will develop policies to improve riparian and floodplain protection across regulatory programs. Call for establishment of Site Potential Tree Height standards to support no net loss of habitat functions and ensure this standard is integrated into all agency programs.
|
|
| Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office |
Commitment: Governor's Salmon Recovery Office (GSRO) will support agency coordination and communication across riparian programs to improve riparian restoration planning and decision making through 2027.
|
|
Indicators
Indicators are one or more metrics that we track consistently over time with repeatable methods. Indicators help us understand key dynamics of interest to tell the story of short-, medium-, and long-term changes in human activities and ecosystem conditions in Puget Sound. Each indicator is evaluated for trend (e.g., 'getting better', 'getting worse', etc.). Some indicators also have targets and are evaluated for target status (whether we have met those targets).
This indicator is under development and is proposed as a measure to integrate attributes of drift cell function including 1) armor and overwater structures in the sediment supply and deposition zones as well as the transport reach, (2) marine riparian vegetation cover, and (3) forage fish presence/absence.
No reported data available
No reported data available
This indicator measures the amount (acres and percent) of floodplain area in functional condition in Puget Sound’s 17 major rivers. Floodplain function is assessed at a regional scale using river connectivity and land use and cover. Areas that have natural land cover and unrestricted river flow are expected to be the most functional and provide the most ecosystem services. Floodplain function is impaired in areas with non-natural land cover or restricted river flow due to constraints or barriers (for example, roads, railroads, and levees).
The Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) describes the biological condition of stream sites and their surrounding habitat based on the diversity and relative abundance of the benthic (bottom dwelling) macroinvertebrates found at the site. Ten measures of biological condition are scored and summarized as the B-IBI, which ranges from a score of 0, indicating very poor stream condition, to 100, indicating excellent condition.
This indicator measures the number of pocket estuaries and embayments that are accessible to juvenile salmon.
No reported data available
This indicator evaluates the abundance and trends of the 22 Chinook salmon populations by measuring the number of natural-origin adult fish on the spawning grounds of five Puget Sound regions. Abundance estimates here do not include hatchery-origin fish (with few exceptions) or Chinook taken in harvest or by predators like orcas. The indicator is intended to reflect the goal of achieving wild population recovery of Puget Sound Chinook, which are federally listed as threatened.
This indicator evaluates the abundance and trend of five coho salmon management units as measured by the number of natural-origin adult fish on the spawning grounds of Puget Sound. Abundance estimates here do not include hatchery-origin fish or coho salmon taken in harvest or by predators like orcas. The indicator is intended to reflect the abundance of wild coho salmon in Puget Sound, which are not federally listed under the Endangered Species Act.
This indicator evaluates the abundance and trend of the 32 steelhead populations by measuring the number of natural-origin adult fish on the spawning grounds of three Puget Sound regions. Abundance estimates here do not include hatchery-origin fish or steelhead taken in harvest or by predators like orcas. The indicator is intended to reflect the goal of achieving wild population recovery of Puget Sound steelhead, which are federally listed as threatened.
This indicator evaluates the abundance and trend of the 2 Hood Canal summer-run chum salmon populations by measuring the number of natural-origin adult fish on the spawning grounds. Abundance estimates here do not include hatchery-origin fish or fish taken in harvest or by predators like orcas. The indicator is intended to reflect the goal of achieving wild population recovery of Hood Canal summer chum, which are federally listed as threatened.
This indicator measures the acres of riparian floodplain areas acquired for conservation or future restoration activities. Riparian areas are critical habitats that border marine and freshwater systems and keep waters clean and cool, control erosion, moderate flooding events, and offer key habitat for a diversity of wildlife. This indicator can help us evaluate our success accelerating the pace of habitat protection.
This indicator measures the acres of riparian floodplain areas improved through restoration activities. Riparian areas are critical habitats that border marine and freshwater systems and keep waters clean and cool, control erosion, moderate flooding events, and offer key habitat for a great diversity of wildlife. This indicator can help us evaluate our success accelerating the pace of habitat restoration.